No AI Lockout
Menu
Our Story

Our Story

Painted desk scene with a person facing a locked account and inaccessible work history
The First Story Is Personal, But The Pattern Is Bigger Than One Family.
01 Why We Started

The First Story.

A Note From Amy

This project started because my father, a paying Anthropic Claude Max subscriber who has lived in California for a little over a year and plans to stay long-term, was locked out during an active workflow before any clear warning or specific explanation arrived. The notice used suspicious-signals and Usage Policy language, revoked access to Claude, and pointed to an appeal form. It did not identify the exact policy, action, evidence, or signal. During the three to four week wait, he sent multiple follow-up emails asking Anthropic for an update. No human ever responded.

The final reply still appeared automated. It said Anthropic could not reinstate the account because of a Usage Policy violation. It did not say which policy was violated. It did not give specific facts. It did not offer a real path back.

After the lockout, he also had no channel to view or export prior Claude conversations. That made project handoff and continuity extremely difficult. Paid users should not lose access to both the tool and their own work history without a clear reason, a real appeal, and a way to recover their data.

That is not a real appeal. That is the lockout this project exists to challenge.

We started this site to document the pattern, find others who experienced it, and push for fair process — clear reasons, real appeals, and a way back.

Read The Full Founder Story
02 Who We Are

Public Enough To Be Accountable. Careful Enough To Protect People.

Lead

Amy

Student project lead and daughter of the affected user whose story anchors this campaign.

Support

Family-Rooted

Built with family support after one lockout made the larger process problem impossible to ignore.

Boundary

No Platform Money

The project does not accept money from AI platforms. Private family details and the affected user's identity stay off the public site unless separately approved.

03 What We Believe

AI Access Is Becoming Civic Infrastructure.

This project is built on a simple idea: access to AI is starting to resemble access to education, libraries, and basic information tools. People increasingly use AI to learn, write, code, translate, work, understand forms, and solve everyday problems.

We are not saying platforms should have no safety rules. We are saying that when tools become this important, an unexplained ban is not just a customer-service problem. It can become a form of exclusion from the systems society is beginning to expect people to use.

Painted library and classroom scene showing people using AI-like tools for learning and public access
04 How Stories Will Be Used

Patterns and aggregates first.
Individual stories only with permission.

A submission is not a publication permission slip. Submissions stay private by default. We will only quote, anonymize, or aggregate stories with explicit per-story permission from the submitter. We will use patterns and aggregated counts in press, policy, and legal advocacy work — never identifying any individual without their consent.

05 Contact

How To Reach Us.

A public project mailbox is being prepared for follow-up, collaboration, and correction or deletion requests. Until this page says the mailbox is open, please do not send sensitive details by email. Affected users should use the Story Submission Page for the current status.

Before sending sensitive details, read how submissions are handled in Privacy & Requests and how public use decisions are governed in Operating Principles.